Weekend top news
Tension as Nigeria, Iran sign nuclear deal
Following a nuclear deal the federal government signed with Iran yesterday, Nigeria may engage the United States in a diplomatic face-off.
Although the deal was signed to shore up Nigeria's domestic and industrial power supply, the US is thinking otherwise.
Washington believes that the deal is a ploy by Iran to extend its nuclear capability to Nigeria, the most populous black nation, using electricity generation as a decoy to manufacture atomic bomb.
The most powerful country has consistently maintained that Iran's nuclear policy is not designed for peaceful purposes but rather, to advance its military prowess. Iran has denied this.
The Abuja-Tehran deal, sealed at the end of a four-hour parley between Nigerian and Iranian officials in Abuja, is to increase electricity generation in the country. The Middle-East country agreed to share nuclear technology with Nigeria.
Minister of State, Foreign Affairs, Alhaji Tijjani Kaura, explained that the technology was not intended for any military use.
Kaura said that the move was directed at boosting the country's economic development - which has been hamstrung by lack of adequate electricity supply.
Nigeria currently generates only 3,300 megawatts of electricity, a far cry from the 20,000 megawatts local demand.
"There shouldn't be a misunderstanding between exploration or uses of energy to provide power and the uses of energy for weapons," Kaura said.
Iranian junior trade minister, Mohammad-Ali Zeyghami, confirmed the agreement. "We not only consider it Iran's inalienable right but also Nigerians' so that they could use this clean source of energy and nobody can limit the use of knowledge anywhere in the world," Zeyghami said.
Despite Nigeria's status as Africa's biggest petroleum producer, epileptic power supply has triggered poor infrastructure, forcing up production cost and sky-rocketing prices
President Umaru Yar' Adua has never hidden his determination to improve power supply.
In fact, he promised to announce emergency in the power sector early this month.
Details of the deal have not been announced, making it difficult to know what technology would be offered by the Iranian government. It is believed this is the fear of the Americans.
It was gathered that the US may use diplomatic channel to persuade Nigeria to reject the, according to a source, "dangerous deal" with Iran. Iran is presently under United Nations (UN) sanctions for defying Security Council's demands to halt uranium enrichment.
The country has insisted that its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it has a right to continue uranium enrichment.
Iran, also a major oil producer, is due to bring on stream its first nuclear energy station at Bushehr early in 2009.
It was gathered that frantic efforts were made yesterday by American officials to persuade Nigeria to ditch the deal with the Iranians.
It is not known if the Americans will resort to force if Nigeria insists on going ahead with the deal.
An information officer at the United States embassy in Abuja, Mohammed Sani, said he was not competent to speak on such a sensitive security issue.
Iran already has Russia on its side in the face-off with the US. A source said the fear of the Americans is that Iran may persuade Nigeria to use its influence to garner African support for the Middle-East country against America in the United Nations.
As builders of Iran's $800 million nuclear power reactor, Russia has long resisted imposing sanctions to halt Iran's programme, which the US says is a cover to make an atomic bomb, but has no corroborative evidence to substantiate it. Washington has convinced Moscow to support three previous sets of Security Council sanctions, although Russia showed much reluctance in following suit.
Iran is the last serious issue" where the George Bush administration has decisions to make in terms of policy of high national security interest to the United States. "Washington and its Western allies accuse Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons under the cover of a civilian nuclear programme, while they have never presented any corroborative document to substantiate their allegations. Iran denies the charges and insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.
Tehran stresses that the country has always pursued a civilian path to provide power to the growing number of Iranian population, whose fossil fuel would eventually run dry.
Despite the rules enshrined in the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) entitling every member state, including Iran, to the right of uranium enrichment, Tehran is now under three rounds of UN Security Council sanctions for turning down West's calls to give up its right of uranium enrichment.
Tehran has dismissed West's demands as "politically tainted and illogical", stressing that sanctions and pressures merely consolidate Iranians' national resolve to continue the path.
Iran has also insisted that it would continue enriching uranium because it needs to provide fuel to a 300-megawatt light-water reactor it is building in the southwestern town of Darkhoveyn as well as its first nuclear power plant in the southern port city of Bushehr.
The Islamic Republic says that it considers its nuclear case closed as it has come clean of IAEA's questions and suspicions about its past nuclear activities.
Yet, the United States has remained at loggerheads with Iran over the independent and home-grown nature of Tehran's nuclear technology, which gives the Islamic Republic the potential to turn into a world power and a role model for other third-world countries.
Morocco 'breaks terror network'
The Moroccan authorities say they have broken up a militant cell operating in several towns in the kingdom.
The group allegedly had links with al- Qaeda and police described the 15 people arrested as "dangerous".
They had electronic and chemical materials used to make explosives, reports the state press agency, MAP.
It is the fourth such network Morocco says it has broken up this year. An al-Qaeda-inspired group has said it was behind recent attacks in Algeria.
"The members of this structure, known as "Fath al-Andalous" [Conquest of Andalusia], planned to carry out attacks in Morocco and had formed operational links with foreign extremists who have pledged allegiance to the al-Qaeda organisation," MAP says.
The BBC's James Copnall in Morocco says this is almost certainly a reference to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (QIM), an organisation largely based in neighbouring Algeria which has ties with Osama bin Laden's movement.
QIM says it has carried out attacks in several other North African countries, as well as the Algeria bombings which left 70 dead.
However, some analysts believe there is little real regional co-ordination between extremist groups.
Our correspondent says Morocco has been accused of over-dramatising the threat it faces from extremists, to benefit from support from the US and Europe.
Nevertheless, he notes that there have been attacks in Morocco: the most dramatic example occurred five years ago, when suicide bombers killed 45 people in Casablanca
Angola reaps oil wealth but many remain poor
LOBITO, Angola (Reuters) - On a recent Friday night, men in SUVs and others on mopeds line up outside one of the few gas stations in Angola's port city of Lobito to fill up for the weekend. As car horns begin to sound, it becomes clear that the gas pumps have once again run dry.
"We provide millions of barrels of oil each month to China and the United States but don't have enough to fill up our own tanks," said David Boio, a local businessmen, as he stepped down from his truck. Since Angola's 27-year civil war ended in 2002, foreign companies have rushed in to tap its oil reserves, making it one of the world's big suppliers. But Angola has failed to provide fuel for its own drivers, one of many paradoxes that overshadow elections set for September 5. Another is that the country earned an estimated record $41 billion (22 billion pounds) in oil exports last year, up from $30 billion in 2006, according to estimates by JP Morgan, but almost 70 percent of its population still lives on less than $2 a day. Analysts blame corruption for the government's inability to improve the lives of its people. Billions of dollars in oil revenue have disappeared from state coffers, according to human rights groups, although a World Bank official said in July that transparency has improved. The ruling MPLA party, a mix of former Marxists and Western-leaning technocrats, has been in power since it declared independence from Portugal in 1975. It is widely expected to win the election. The main opposition party, UNITA, which lost the civil war against the government, has promised to end poverty by using oil revenues to invest in the country's once-prosperous farm sector. The other 12 parties in the race are small and have barely enough funds to be heard. While Angolans may wonder whether the elections -- the first national vote since the end of the civil war -- will bring more accountability in government, oil companies are widely seen as having little interest in a change of government.
"The oil industry wants stability and access to oil reserves and therefore an expected victory from the MPLA party will be good news for them," said Alex Vines, the head of the Africa program at London-based think-tank Chatham House.
Local analysts agree. "The oil industry is not bound by ethical or moral constraints but by principles of profitability," said Justino Pinto de Andrade, the head of the economics department at the Catholic University of Luanda. "All they want is for things to remain as they are."
Vikea Cambulo, a professor of sociology at the Agostinho Neto University, noted that the oil companies are finally reaping the rewards of billions of dollars of investment in Angola's deepwater resources. "Why should these oil companies want a change in government?" Cambulo asked.
WORLD STAGE Producing almost 2 million barrels of oil per day, Angola now rivals Nigeria as Africa's biggest oil producer. It is the biggest supplier of oil to China and the sixth biggest to the United States. Oil accounts for about 90 percent of Angola's exports.
Angola's status as a rising star in the oil world allowed it to join the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, raising its profile on the international stage. Its mostly off-shore reserves stand at about 11.4 billion proven barrels of oil, about the same reserves as Algeria, according to estimates by Edinburgh-based energy consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. Despite such wealth, about five million people live in shanty towns around Luanda, the capital city, without clean water or electricity.
The government says it is working on a 200,000 bpd refinery in Lobito to replace the country's struggling 39,000 bpd refinery and provide gasoline for the local market. But the $3.5 billion project has been stalled for years as state-owned oil firm Sonangol struggles to find foreign investors. Analysts say such concerns do not matter much for investors, who are happy to continue to deal with a business-friendly government keen to grant access to one of the world's biggest untapped oil reserves.
"Assuming no unrest is associated with the elections, the expectation is that the MPLA will again dominate parliament and the process will pass peacefully. I don't think much will change," said Graham Stock, executive director at JP Morgan Research on Emerging Markets. "The main driver for investor interest in Angola is geological rather than political," he said. While oil companies like Chevron, Angola's biggest producer, decline to comment on the election, western oil executives openly favour of the ruling party."The MPLA has to win," said an oil executive at a bar of a $300 a night hotel in Luanda. He identified himself only as Joe, because of his company's policy of not commenting on the elections.
Delighted Sudanese home after hijacking ordeal
Overjoyed passengers from a hijacked Sudanese jet returned home to delighted families on Thursday, having feared they would die at the hands of gunmen who threatened to blow up the plane. Two hijackers of the passenger plane surrendered to Libyan authorities at a remote desert airport on Wednesday after freeing all passengers on board, almost 24 hours after the drama began in Darfur.
"The hijackers surrendered without any violence and the crew are safe and sound," said a Libyan official from the World War II-era military airport in Kufra, an oasis in the southeast of the north African country. Around 150 loved ones gathered at the airport in Khartoum, ululating and whistling across the festive beat of sufi music to greet the freed passengers who landed at the ill-fated flight's original destination.
"I'm very happy, thank God, I'm very happy," said Ishaq Abdallah Yahiya, a slightly dazed 25-year-old student from South Darfur. Passengers said the hijackers, armed with two small guns, claimed there explosives on board and threatened to blow up the Boeing 737.
"He (one of the hijackers) said no one should move from their place. 'If anybody moves, we'll blow the plane, your all become nothing, we become nothing, everything becomes nothing'," said Yahiya.
The two attackers, who claimed to be from Sudan's conflict-ridden region of Darfur, hijacked the plane on Tuesday shortly after takeoff from Darfur's biggest city of Nyala. They surrendered several hours after negotiations led to the release of all 87 passengers from the Sun Air plane which was forced to land in Kufra on Tuesday evening after it ran short of fuel.
But they initially refused to release the eight-member crew, demanding that the plane be refuelled for a flight to Paris, an official said. One passenger said conditions in the searing heat became unbearable after the air conditioning broke down, as people vomited and children urinated, with a stench of rotting meat from passengers' luggage overwhelming.
"We couldn't move. We couldn't even scratch our heads, we couldn't go to the toilet, no water, nothing," said another passenger.
"I was afraid... They said they had explosives,'" he added. The hijackers, who had refused to talk directly with Libyan officials, said they belong to the Sudanese Liberation Army, whose exiled leader Abdel Wahid Mohammed Nur lives in Paris, according to airport director Khaled Saseya. Libyan authorities have still not been able to confirm the identities of the hijackers and an investigation was being launched, an official said, adding that a 20-strong Sudanese delegation was in Kufra. Sudan foreign ministry spokesman Ali al-Sadiq condemned the hijacking and called on the Libyan authorities to deport the "terrorists" to Khartoum.
"I was so hysterical. I thought it was a disaster," said Diana Adam, the 15-year-old daughter of one official from a former Darfur rebel movement that signed a 2006 peace agreement with the Khartoum government in 2006.
"Now I'm very happy," she said, smiling and being hugged by her father. Libya's civil aviation director Mohammed Shlibaq said that two Egyptian members of the UN-led Darfur peacekeeping force, two Ethiopians and a Ugandan were among the passengers, the official JANA news agency reported. Several Sudanese officials were on board, including the tribal affairs adviser at the Provisional Authority in Darfur, Yaqub al-Malik Mohamed Yaqub.
No Darfur movement has publicly claimed responsibility for the hijacking. Abdel Wahid Mohammed Nur denied the hijacking was the work of his Sudanese Liberation Army faction, one of two Darfur movements that first rose up against the Arab-dominated government in 2003.
SLA commander Ibrahim al-Hillo suggested the hijackers could be Nur sympathisers. The SLA has fractured into multiple groups over the more than five years of war in Sudan's western Darfur region. The United Nations says up to 300,000 people have died and more than 2.2 million fled their homes since war in Darfur erupted in February 2003. Sudan says 10,000 have been killed. Ethnic minority rebels took up arms against the Arab-dominated Khartoum regime and state-backed Arab militias, fighting for resources and power.

